In the era of Generative Engine Optimization (GEO), crafting content requires a strategic blend of traditional SEO best practices and new techniques aimed at AI-driven search experiences. As search evolves from keyword-based queries to AI-generated answers, content marketers must adapt how they create and structure information online.
This article explores how to produce content that not only ranks in classic search engines but is also favored and directly utilized by Large Language Model (LLM) systems like ChatGPT, Google’s Gemini-powered search, Bing Chat, Perplexity, Anthropic Claude, Meta’s LLaMA, xAI’s Grok, and other emerging AI tools. We will examine why demonstrating E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness) and originality is paramount, what types of content AI can’t easily replicate, how to format content for AI excerpting, the benefits of a conversational tone and FAQ-style organization, and the importance of continual content updates to remain relevant in the AI age.
Throughout, we’ll include real-world examples and up-to-date statistics, and we’ll highlight tools and tactics for optimizing content to be discovered—and even quoted—by generative AI systems. By the end of this post, online marketing professionals will have a clear action plan for creating AI-optimized content that drives visibility and traffic in the generative search era.
E-E-A-T and Originality as Differentiators
One of the most critical factors for content success in generative search is adhering to Google’s E-E-A-T guidelines: Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness. High-quality, expert content matters more than ever because AI models tend to favor and surface information from sources that demonstrate credibility and depth ( [1] ) ( [2] ).
In Google’s experimental Search Generative Experience (SGE) and “AI overviews,” for example, users noticed that well-known websites and brands (those with strong authority signals) were appearing prominently in the AI-generated answers ( [1] ). This suggests that Google’s algorithms, when selecting content to include in a generative snippet, lean heavily on perceived authority and trust – essentially, E-E-A-T still matters in the AI search era ( [3] ).
Illustration of Google’s E-E-A-T framework – Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness – as four pillars of content quality. In the AI-driven search landscape, content that demonstrates these qualities is more likely to be seen as reliable and thus favored by search engines and AI assistants. Ensuring your content showcases firsthand experience, expert knowledge ( expertise ), recognized authority, and solid trustworthiness can significantly improve its chances of being referenced in generative AI results. ( [4] ) ( [2] )
Why E-E-A-T is crucial for GEO: Generative AI tools like ChatGPT and Google’s upcoming Gemini model are trained on vast swaths of internet text. When these models formulate answers, they probabilistically draw on patterns learned from their training data. They don’t truly know which sources are authoritative, but their training process means that information echoed by many reputable sources – or by sources with strong digital footprints – carries more weight. Google’s own systems explicitly aim to surface high-quality info from reliable sources and to downplay content that lacks authority or trustworthiness ( [5] ) ( [2] ).
In practice, this means that content written by recognized experts, content published on sites with a reputation for subject authority, and content that provides trustworthy, accurate information is far more likely to be selected by AI summarizers. As one industry guide noted in early 2024, Google is expected to “continue emphasizing E-E-A-T in content discovery results, whether in AI or regular search,” with the credibility of the page, author, and website all factoring into what gets displayed ( [6] ). In short, demonstrating E-E-A-T in your content isn’t just about pleasing human readers – it directly influences whether an AI will treat your content as a trustworthy source worth including in an answer.
Originality and firsthand experience: A key aspect of E-E-A-T that **AI struggles to replicate is experience. Large language models can aggregate and rephrase common knowledge from the web, but they lack genuine firsthand experience or original insight. Content that showcases personal experience or unique expertise will stand out as something AI cannot simply generate on its own** ( [7] ). For example, a travel website that includes a blog post like “My 7-day trek through the Andes – lessons learned” (with vivid personal details, original photos, and first-person tips) is offering something qualitatively different from the generic travel summaries an AI might produce from Wikipedia and standard tourist info.
That human touch – the experience – makes the content more trustworthy and valuable. In Google’s ranking guidelines, “experience” was added as a new facet to E-A-T in 2022, precisely to encourage content creators to share firsthand experiences when relevant (such as a product review written by someone who has actually used the product, or an analysis by a professional who has hands-on experience in the field).
In the generative age, we can expect AI-driven search to similarly reward content that carries the stamp of personal experience and originality. Not only do human reviewers value this, but AI models trained on vast data can often detect when content is merely rehashing generic facts versus when it provides a novel perspective or real-life example. Indeed, marketers have found that AI-generated text often feels generic or “flat” without human insight – one marketing firm noted that “without a human perspective, AI-generated content can feel generic—or worse, misinformed”, underscoring that authentic human input is still critical ( [8] ).
Authoritativeness and branding: Another facet of E-E-A-T is Authority, which in practice can relate to your brand’s reputation or your authors’ credentials. In the context of GEO, authority might be signaled by factors like: Are other sites referencing your content? Do your pages have quality backlinks? Is your brand well-known in the industry? Are your experts cited elsewhere? All these contribute to whether an AI might “think” of or prefer your content when constructing an answer.
For instance, SEO professionals observed in 2024 that “big name” websites had an edge in Google’s AI overviews – likely because Google’s system associated those domains with authoritative content ( [3] ). This doesn’t mean smaller sites can’t get included, but it means establishing topical authority is key. Writing thorough, well-researched content and getting recognized (via references, mentions, or shares) by others in your field will help build that authority over time.
Even on AI platforms like ChatGPT, which don’t link out by default, the underlying model is more likely to produce information it saw on authoritative sites during training. Thus, being cited on high-authority platforms (news sites, respected blogs, scholarly articles, etc.) indirectly influences LLMs. For example, if your company is frequently mentioned in industry reports or has a Wikipedia page, that information is in the training data of many models – increasing the odds that ChatGPT knows about it and might include it in relevant answers.
In essence, digital authority translates to AI visibility, so investing in authoritative content (and promotion of that content through digital PR, thought leadership, etc.) is a strategic move.
Trustworthiness and accuracy: AI models are notorious for sometimes generating confident-sounding but incorrect information (the so-called “hallucinations”). To minimize errors, LLM-based search experiences prefer content that is accurate and trustworthy. As content creators, this means double-down on fact-checking, citing reliable sources, and keeping information up-to-date.
If your page contains claims or stats, reference the source or provide context – not only does this build trust with human readers, but those references might be part of what an AI uses to judge the veracity of your content. Google’s systems, for instance, place heavier emphasis on reliability signals for queries where accuracy is critical (health, finance, etc.) ( [5] ). For generative AI, if the model finds two conflicting pieces of information, it’s more likely to use the one that appeared in a context with other trust signals (for example, on a site with high E-E-A-T or in proximity to authoritative language).
Practical tip: Showcase trustworthiness by having clear author bios (highlight credentials), including editorial policies or references, using HTTPS (security), and maintaining a clean site free of spammy ads or misleading layouts. All of these small factors can cumulatively enhance how your content is perceived by algorithms and users alike. BrandScanner offers an AI content optimizer tool, that helps you optimize your website content for better visibility in AI systems and LLMs. Enhance semantic richness, improve structure, and naturally integrate keywords for maximum AI comprehension.
Google’s stance on AI-generated vs human content: It’s worth noting that Google has clarified it doesn’t outright discriminate against AI-generated content – the key is quality. “Using AI doesn’t give content any special gains. It’s just content. If it is useful, helpful, original, and satisfies aspects of E-E-A-T, it might do well in Search,” Google stated plainly ( [2] ). In other words, Google cares about the end result, not whether a human or an AI wrote it. However, this also implies that **low-quality AI-written content that lacks originality or depth will not do well, and Google’s algorithms (and manual reviewers) are actively looking to down-rank or penalize content produced simply to game the system. In fact, in 2024 Google undertook major core updates to target spammy AI content.
A notable example was Google’s April 2024 core update**, which “gave weighty punishments (including thousands of manual actions) to sites relying heavily on AI-generated content” that was of low value ( [9] ). Many websites that had flooded their pages with auto-generated text saw their search rankings plummet ( [9] ).
The takeaway is clear: AI can be a useful tool in content creation, but it must be guided by human expertise and oversight. Mass-producing generic AI content is a recipe for disaster. Instead, if you use AI at all in writing, use it for initial drafts or outlines and then infuse human insights, originality, and editorial rigor into the final product ( [10] ). This aligns with the principle of E-E-A-T – the content should reflect human experience and trustworthiness, regardless of the tools used to create it.
Actionable steps to boost E-E-A-T in content:
- Show your credentials: Attach author names to articles and include brief bios highlighting their expertise or experience in the topic. If your CEO writes a blog post on industry trends, mention their years of experience or notable achievements. Such signals help both users and AI gauge expertise ( [11] ).
- Cite sources and data: Whenever you present facts, statistics, or claims, back them up with references to credible sources. Not only does this build trust, but these citations could be picked up by AI models as part of the content’s context, reinforcing accuracy.
- Demonstrate experience: Where applicable, weave in personal experience or company-specific knowledge. For example, “At [Company], we tested this tool internally and found…” or “In my 10 years of practicing dietetics, I’ve observed…”. This kind of language can explicitly highlight experience (the new first “E”) to both readers and algorithms.
- Maintain a positive brand presence: Off-page factors contribute to authority. Encourage happy customers to leave reviews, participate in relevant forums or Q&As (like Quora, StackExchange), and collaborate with respected partners. All these build a web of trust around your brand name. As later posts will detail, brand mentions across the web can influence AI outputs. For instance, LLMs like ChatGPT effectively treat a concept mentioned frequently across many contexts as more “true” or at least more salient ( [12] ) ( [12] ). If your brand is consistently associated with a certain expertise (say your fintech blog is cited often regarding blockchain security), an AI is more likely to bring up your insights on that subject.
- Avoid manipulative tactics: Transparency is key to trust. Don’t hide sponsored content without disclosure, don’t stuff keywords or use cloaking. Google’s quality guidelines remain in force – any attempt to deceive users or the algorithm can backfire, especially now that AI systems might summarize exactly what’s on your page to users. You wouldn’t want an AI snippet to expose something like “This article doesn’t actually answer the question” or “The content appears auto-generated and thin” – which could happen if those elements are detectable.
In summary, focusing on E-E-A-T and originality is about aligning your content with what both humans and AI find valuable : reliable knowledge, authentic perspective, and proven expertise. Generative AI is essentially an aggregator and amplifier of content patterns – if your content consistently embodies high quality and uniqueness, it increases the likelihood that AI will learn from it, select it, and propagate it when relevant user queries arise.
By doubling down on quality and authenticity, you’re not just future-proofing for algorithms; you’re delivering real value to readers – which is exactly the point, after all.
Creating Content AI Can’t Easily Replicate
With the advent of advanced AI like GPT-4, Gemini, and open-source LLMs, it’s easier than ever to generate passable content on almost any topic. From generic how-to guides to basic product descriptions, AI can churn out “good enough” versions of widely available information in seconds.
This raises a pivotal question for content strategists: What can we create that AI won’t simply generate itself? In other words, how do we make our content a “must-have” unique resource, rather than just another redundant web page?
The answer lies in focusing on material that goes beyond easily scraped facts and common knowledge. Content that AI can’t easily replicate typically includes original research, proprietary data, deep analysis, strong opinions grounded in expertise, nuanced perspectives, and storytelling rooted in personal experience. These are the elements that make your content valuable and differentiating – not just to human readers, but also to AI systems that decide whether to quote or reference your site versus a hundred other sites saying the same thing.
AI’s limitation – the lack of true originality: By design, generative AI models work by predicting likely sequences of words based on patterns in their training data. They excel at “regurgitating” the common denominator of what’s been published on a topic ( [13] ). For instance, ask an AI about the benefits of drinking green tea, and it will compile well-known points (antioxidants, improved focus, etc.) that appear across many articles.
What AI does not do well is introduce completely new ideas or insights that haven’t already been extensively documented. It cannot truly originate a fresh research finding or recount a personal anecdote it never encountered. As an SEO expert succinctly put it, “AI is great at regurgitating common knowledge, but it struggles with original research, firsthand experience, and unique data.” ( [13] ).
Google itself has acknowledged this in the context of search, emphasizing the value of “hidden gems” – content that provides unique insights not easily found elsewhere ( [13] ). For your content strategy, this means that if you produce the same cookie-cutter listicles or superficial content that dozens of other sites have, an AI overview will have no compelling reason to specifically include your phrasing or cite your page. Why would it, if you’re offering nothing new?
On the flip side, if you publish something truly unique, then when users ask about that niche topic, your content is far more likely to be the one AI pulls in ( [14] ).
Examples of content AI can’t easily replicate:
Original research and data: If your company conducts a study or survey and publishes never-before-seen data, that’s gold. For example, imagine you run an email marketing platform and you analyze billions of emails to determine optimal send times or average open rates by industry. If you publish that report with detailed findings, AI models will eventually ingest that information as unique knowledge associated with your site. When someone asks, “What’s a good email open rate in retail?” an AI might actually cite or reference your data (especially if your study becomes frequently quoted by others, reinforcing its presence). In fact, marketers are increasingly doing this – Content Marketing Institute’s 2024 report noted a rise in brands creating data-driven content as a way to stand out, because it earns backlinks and trust. Unique statistics have always been link bait; now they’re also “AI bait.”
Neil Patel’s team advises brands to “publish original research, case studies, or expert insights” because AI models favor content that offers fresh, data-driven perspectives that aren’t already ubiquitous elsewhere ( [11] ). A real-world example: the site Ahrefs once did an original study showing that 90.63% of web pages get zero Google traffic (a striking statistic widely cited in SEO circles). That kind of original finding not only earned them human attention and backlinks, but any AI model trained on recent SEO content will also “know” that fact – and might mention Ahrefs or the stat in an answer about SEO challenges. The principle for you: invest in creating content that provides new data or insights – run a poll, analyze your user data (anonymously and ethically), perform an experiment or A/B test and share the results. This is content no one else has because only you had access to it.
Case studies and in-depth analyses: AI can summarize generic best practices, but it cannot easily replicate a detailed case study of your client or your project. For instance, if you’re a marketing agency, writing a case study like “How We Increased Client X’s Conversion Rate by 50% in 3 Months – A Step-by-Step Breakdown” is highly valuable. It contains specific context, strategies applied, results, and lessons learned that aren’t published elsewhere. Another example: a cybersecurity blog might publish a teardown of a new malware strain based on the researchers’ hands-on analysis – again, unique content.
These pieces serve a dual purpose: they are compelling to professionals in the field, and they provide fodder for AI that goes beyond the generic. If someone asks an AI, “How can e-commerce sites improve conversion?”, a generic model might list tips like “improve page speed” or “better CTAs.” But if your unique case study on improving conversion has been widely read and linked, a sophisticated AI (especially one like Bing or Perplexity that cites sources) might pull in a line from your case study, e.g., “One fashion retailer saw a 50% conversion lift by streamlining their checkout process ( [15] ).” The AI might even name the retailer or your blog if it was cited in training data or used as a source.
By offering concrete, original examples, you give AI something specific to latch onto. Strong opinions and thought leadership: While AI can mimic a “bland consensus” of opinions found online, it tends to avoid taking controversial or very distinctive stances on its own. Content that includes a strong, well-argued opinion or a novel theory can thus stand out.
For example, a technology analyst’s blog post titled “Why I Believe AI Chatbots Should Pay for Consuming Content” with a clear viewpoint and supporting arguments is unique content. If that perspective gains traction (perhaps it’s discussed on social media or other blogs), it might influence AI responses on the topic. A user might ask ChatGPT, “Should AI companies pay content creators?” and get an answer like, “There’s a debate on this. Some experts, such as [Name], argue that they should, citing reasons like X, while others say Y.” If your content is the one that started or exemplified that viewpoint, it may get a nod in the AI’s synthesized answer.
Caveat: One must be careful that opinions are grounded in truth and not misinformation – LLMs also have a bias toward the majority view or well-established facts, and they try not to amplify fringe ideas unless prompted. But a well-reasoned expert opinion can become part of the “knowledge mix” for a topic, especially if it’s picked up by multiple sources. So don’t shy away from publishing insightful commentary or forecasts in your domain. It humanizes your brand and could become reference material.
Storytelling and rich narratives: Storytelling – whether it’s customer success stories, personal journeys, or historical narratives – is another area where humans excel over AI. ChatGPT can produce a story, yes, but only based on patterns of stories it has read; it cannot replicate your story that has never been told. If you run a niche museum, an article like “The Lost Painting that Transformed Our Museum’s Fortunes – An Insider Story” will be one-of-a-kind. Humans love stories, and we remember them; AI, trained on what humans write and share, will “notice” a memorable story too. High-engagement content (measured by backlinks, time on page, social shares) is likely to bubble up in training data significance.
So, if your story-driven content gains popularity, an AI might incorporate elements of it when relevant. Additionally, narrative content often includes many concrete details (dates, names, places) that could get picked up as facts by AI. For example, if your CEO writes “A Day in the Life” post describing how she uses your product, and it’s widely read, an AI might later answer a question about your product by saying “According to [Your CEO]’s account, she uses it every morning for XYZ.”
Content with real E xperience: Expanding on the E-E-A-T “experience” point – content such as hands-on reviews, tutorials with step-by-step photos from real use, or field reports offer something AI cannot fake. A blog that shows “before and after” images of an actual home DIY project with personal notes will have unique value. Travel diaries, as mentioned earlier, or an entrepreneur’s first-person account of launching a startup – these are slices of reality. For instance, if you publish “Our Startup’s First 100 Days: What Went Wrong and What We Learned,” no AI can automatically produce that specific content because the experiences and mistakes are unique to you. If another founder asks an AI for advice on early-stage startups, the model might draw on insights from first-person accounts like yours (especially if such accounts become part of common knowledge in that sphere).
We can already see this on platforms like Perplexity AI, which tends to cite blog posts or personal essays when a user’s question is specific (e.g., “What is it like to scale a startup from 0 to 1 million users?” might pull from an entrepreneur’s Medium story).
Make content “AI-inclusion friendly”: The goal is to be the content that adds value to an AI’s answer rather than content the AI can replace. One way to think about it: If an AI can answer a user’s question fully without using your content, then your content wasn’t unique or deep enough. You want to cover the aspects that are missing from the general corpus. In SEO terms, this is similar to finding content gaps that others haven’t written about or angles they haven’t covered.
A practical strategy is to do searches (or even ask ChatGPT/Bing) around your topic and see what the common answers are – then ask, what’s not being said here? Fill that void with your content. For example, dozens of articles may list “10 tips for reducing employee burnout,” but maybe none share an actual employee’s perspective or an interview with a psychologist. If you add those elements, your piece now has unique insight.
Leverage user-generated content and community : An often overlooked but powerful source of uniqueness is user-generated content (UGC) – comments, forums, Q&As. Google’s SGE has been spotted citing Reddit threads or StackOverflow answers for certain queries, precisely because those often contain real-life experiences or niche solutions that no polished blog covered ( [16] ) ( [17] ).
AI models attach high value to content that reflects real-world experiences ( [18] ). You might consider incorporating community elements on your own site (for instance, allow comments where users share their experiences, host discussion boards, or include testimonial sections). Not only does this enrich your content with perspectives beyond your own, but those contributions themselves could be what an AI picks up on.
For example, a cooking site might have a comments section where users share their tweaks to a recipe. An AI asked about a recipe variation could pull an idea from a user comment that said “I substitute buttermilk for milk in this cake and it improves the texture.” If that comment lives on your page, the AI’s snippet might end up implicitly bolstering your page’s content in the answer (and possibly citing the page in tools like Bing/Perplexity).
Some strategies here include hosting FAQ sections or forums on-site. If you can accumulate a knowledge base of Q&A (like “official answers from our experts” alongside user questions), it’s both unique content and aligned with what people actually ask (more on Q&A format in section 9.4).
Timeliness and real-time information: Another kind of content AI can’t inherently have (without external retrieval) is very recent or real-time information. If something just happened – say a new law was passed that affects your industry – AI with a fixed knowledge cutoff won’t know about it. Even AI with web access will rely on whatever news or commentary is out there. Being among the first to publish a thoughtful analysis or update about a breaking development can give you a window of uniqueness.
For example, when Google released an algorithm update or a new AI feature, SEO blogs that quickly provided analysis got a lot of attention (and their insights became part of the knowledge that people and possibly AI associated with that event). If you consistently provide up-to-date content on emerging topics, you become a go-to source that AI might check (through browsing plugins or user prompts) and eventually learn from when its training data catches up. Chapter 5 discussed ChatGPT’s browsing and plugins – those mean that even training cutoffs can be overcome if users explicitly ask for fresh info.
In practice, a Perplexity or Bing will directly cite fresh content. So, being timely and accurate can put your content in those citation lists, even for queries that AI answers directly. We’ll talk more about keeping content updated in section 9.5, but it’s worth noting here that freshness coupled with substance is a winning combo: new info that’s also unique info is especially valuable.
Content types summary: To visualize how different content types fare in terms of AI replicability and value, consider the following comparison:
| Content Type | Can AI Easily Generate It? | Value for GEO (AI Optimization) |
|---|---|---|
| Basic factual info / definitions | Yes. AI is trained on widely available facts and can generate definitions or common knowledge easily. | Low unique value. Necessary to cover on your site, but not sufficient to stand out. If your content only repeats what’s commonly known, AI might answer without needing your phrasing. To add value, pair facts with unique insights or examples. |
| Widely covered “how-to” topics | Yes, partially. AI can generate generic step-by-step guides for common tasks. | Moderate value if enhanced. A plain-vanilla how-to is not unique, but if you include original tips, troubleshooting from experience, or non-obvious steps, it becomes more valuable. Include something exclusive. |
| Trending news / Recent updates | Not initially. AI without updated info won’t know new developments; AI that browses relies on external sources. | High value (time-limited). Being early with insights can make your content the reference point. Value normalizes as more outlets cover it, so combine timeliness with analysis. |
| Original research & proprietary data | No. AI cannot create data outside its training set. | Very high value. Only you have this content. AI may need to reference your data to answer fully. Generates backlinks and raises authority. |
| In-depth case studies / examples | No. AI can’t fabricate credible real scenarios. | Very high value. Adds depth and context. AI often lacks real examples; your case studies can shape AI responses on that topic. |
| Personal experiences / testimonials | No. AI has no genuine personal experiences. | High value. Authentic voices resonate. Testimonials can be used by AI to answer questions about benefits and build trust. |
| Strong opinion pieces | No (not uniquely). AI can echo common opinions. | High value (if authoritative). A distinct expert stance sets content apart and positions your brand as a thought leader. |
| FAQs and Q&A format content | Partly. AI can generate generic Q&As, but brand-specific Q&As are unique. | High value. Direct Q&A pairs can be reused by AI to answer similar queries. Matches how users interact with chatbots. |
| Interactive or visual content (tools, infographics) | No. AI can’t recreate interactives or interpret visuals deeply without specific training. | Moderate to high value. Drives backlinks and engagement, boosts authority, and differentiates your content beyond text. |
Case in point:
A well-known tech blog, let’s call it “TechGuru”, noticed that its generic product round-ups were getting little traction in AI-driven results (because similar summaries existed on many sites). In 2024, they pivoted to focus on pieces like “Our 3-Month Test of the New VR Headset: An Honest Take” which included original benchmarks, and “Interview with a VR Developer – What Others Won’t Tell You.” These articles contained insights and quotes you couldn’t find elsewhere.
The result? Not only did human readers love it (increasing shares and backlinks), but when users began asking AI assistants “Is the new VR headset worth it?”, some AI tools started referencing points that originated from TechGuru’s analysis (one even paraphrased the developer’s quote from their interview). TechGuru effectively made their content part of the “source material” for AI answers by being unique and valuable.
In summary, content AI can’t easily replicate is your ticket to standing out. It positions you as a leader rather than a follower. By prioritizing original research, unique case studies, personal experiences, and novel insights, you make your content inherently more interesting and more likely to be referenced by both humans and machines. Think of generative AI as an amplifier – it will amplify the common noise for common questions, but it will also amplify unique signals if they answer a need. Make your content that unique signal. In the next section, we’ll explore how to format and structure this content so that AI systems can recognize and excerpt those valuable nuggets with ease.
Structuring Pages for AI Excerpting
Even the most brilliant piece of content can be overlooked by AI if it’s not presented in a way that the algorithms can easily digest and extract. In GEO, how you structure and format your content is almost as important as what you write. LLMs scanning a page for an answer (whether in the training phase or via real-time retrieval) look for clear, logical structures – much like humans do when quickly skimming. Think about it: when you, as a person, want a quick answer from a long article, you rely on headings, bullet points, summaries, or highlighted text to find what you need.
AI is similar. By structuring your content with explicit sections, concise answers, and scannable elements, you make it far more likely that an AI will identify the relevant piece of information and include it verbatim (or nearly verbatim) in a generative answer. In the classic SEO world, we optimized for featured snippets and People Also Ask by structuring content to directly answer common queries.
In the GEO world, we optimize for AI snippets by structuring content to be AI-friendly. This practice is sometimes called Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) – ensuring that content is in a format that answer engines (voice assistants, chatbots, etc.) can pull from. The difference now is that instead of an answer engine just quoting a sentence or two (like a featured snippet), large language models might consume more of your content to form a composite answer. Therefore, clarity and sectioning help them grab exactly what’s needed. Here are key tactics for structuring content for AI excerpting.
Use clear and descriptive headings
Break your content into logical sections with descriptive H2s, H3s, etc. that explicitly convey what each section is about. Not only does this help human readers navigate, but it also helps AI models pinpoint where in your article a particular subtopic is addressed.
For example, in this very post we have headings like “Structuring Pages for AI Excerpting” and subheads for each tactic – an AI scanning this text can quickly locate the section on “Bullet points” or “FAQ format” because the headings act as signposts. When an AI receives a query, it may internalize your page’s heading hierarchy to decide which part to grab.
If your headings align with question intent (e.g., a heading that is phrased as a question, or contains the keywords of a likely question), you increase the chance of that section being used. In fact, question-formatted headings (like “How to …”, “What is …”, “Tips for …”) can be very effective. Google’s own generative search tends to trigger on full questions ( [21] ), and it likely favors content structured to answer those. If your blog post has the title “How Does X Work?” and under it an H2 “How Does X Work?” followed by a clear answer, you’re essentially handing the AI a snippet on a silver platter.
Front-load answers in each section
In journalistic writing, there’s the concept of the inverted pyramid – put the most important information first.
Similarly, for AI excerpting, consider front-loading each section with a concise answer or summary, then use the rest of the section to elaborate or provide examples.
Why? Because if an LLM finds a direct answer early in a section, it might not need to generate one from scratch. Many SEO experts recommend including a “snippet-worthy” sentence right after a heading. For instance, if one of your headings is “What is GEO?”, the first sentence that follows could be something like: “Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) is the practice of optimizing content to be discovered and utilized by generative AI models in search ( [22] ).”
That single sentence is a perfect candidate for an AI to lift if someone asks “What is GEO?” Thereafter, you can go into detail, give background, etc. We see parallels in featured snippet optimization: pages that win snippets often have a succinct definition or answer immediately following a relevant heading or the question itself. The same concept applies with generative AI – give it the answer in a nutshell, and it might just use your exact wording (which is great for attribution and brand exposure if the AI cites sources).
Utilize bullet points and numbered lists
Bullet points and numbered lists are an AI’s friend.
They provide a structured, predictable format that language models can easily follow and extract from. If a user asks, “What are the steps to accomplish X?” and your article has a section “Steps to accomplish X” with 1, 2, 3 listed, there’s a high chance an AI like Bing Chat will respond with something like, “According to [YourSite], the steps are: (1) …, (2) …, (3) … ( [23] ).” In fact, models like GPT-4 often retain list formatting when providing answers with multiple points, because it aligns with how information was presented in sources.
Neil Patel’s 2025 SEO guide explicitly notes: “Provide in-depth answers that AI can summarize easily: Structure your content with clear sections, bullet points, and concise explanations.” and “Structure content with FAQs so it’s easier for AI to pull key takeaways: Add a dedicated FAQ section…” ( [24] ). This advice is borne out by observation: if you look at some Google AI overviews or Bing answers, they often quote bulleted content directly, especially for “list” queries like best practices, advantages/disadvantages, checklists, etc.
For example, a Perplexity AI answer about “benefits of cloud computing” might literally show bullet points that were taken from a source article’s list of benefits ( [25] ) ( [26] ). To leverage this, whenever appropriate, use bullets to highlight key points or lists of recommendations. Make sure each bullet is relatively short and self-contained (one sentence or so is ideal), because an AI might quote a subset of your bullets. If the bullet needs more elaboration, you can indent a sub-point or write a brief paragraph below it; the main bullet should still encapsulate the core idea.
Pro tip: Sometimes phrase the bullet introducer in a way that fits many questions. For example: “The main benefits of X include:” and then bullet list. Or “Key features of Y:” then bullets. This wording increases the likelihood of alignment with a user’s question phrasing.
Provide summary sections or conclusions
Consider adding a summary or conclusion section that distills the key takeaways of your content.
Titles for this could be “In Summary,” “Key Takeaways,” “Conclusion,” or even a TL;DR. AI models that parse your text might give special attention to these sections because they often contain condensed information. In some cases, if an AI has a limited window to ingest content (for instance, an AI browsing plugin that only grabs the first or last part of an article due to token limits), having a summary ensures your main points get through.
We’ve observed that ChatGPT, when asked to provide sources for an answer, will sometimes quote text that appeared near the end or beginning of an article – likely because that’s where a summary or definition was. A quick audit of AI-generated responses on forums has shown that sentences starting with phrases like “In summary,” or “In conclusion,” from source articles sometimes appear in the answers. Thus, writing a strong concluding paragraph that reiterates critical points can both help human readers remember and give AI a chunk of text that’s perfect for citing.
Also, an introductory paragraph that succinctly answers the topic question can serve similarly. Think of Wikipedia intros: they answer “what is this topic” in a few sentences before delving deeper. Many LLMs learned from Wikipedia’s style to grab intros as definitions. So applying a bit of that style – an intro that gives a high-level answer – can make your page more likely to be used for quick definitions or overviews in AI responses.
Implement schema markup (structured data)
While schema markup (like FAQ schema, HowTo schema, etc.) is traditionally a way to get rich results in Google’s SERPs, it may also indirectly assist AI systems in understanding page structure. Google’s generative search can leverage structured data – for example, properly marked FAQs might feed its AI overview for a question by directly extracting the Q&A pair. Neil Patel’s advice includes “Implement structured data like FAQ schema to make it easier for AI to extract information.” ( [24] ).
If you have an FAQ section on a page, adding FAQPage schema tells search engines (and any AI reading the DOM with that context) exactly where the question and answer are. This precision can only help in targeting the right snippet. Even outside of Google, any tool that parses HTML might notice structured data as signifying important content. For instance, Bing’s crawler or others could use it for reinforcement. It’s not a guarantee, but it’s a no-regret move since schema also benefits your SEO generally.
Focus on FAQ schema for common Q&As, HowTo schema if you have step-by-step instructions, Article schema with author and date (reinforces E-E-A-T), and Review/Rating schema if applicable (which could be used in AI summaries like “Product X has an average rating of 4.5 stars based on 200 reviews” – a factual snippet an AI might mention).
Craft FAQ sections (and use the Q&A format in content)
Dedicating a part of your content to frequently asked questions is extremely effective for GEO. As mentioned, many people interact with AI tools by literally asking questions (“natural language queries”). If your site literally poses the question and gives the answer, it aligns perfectly.
For instance, at the end of a long blog post about electric cars, you might have an FAQ that includes “Q: How long do electric car batteries last? A: Typically 8-10 years or around 100,000 miles, though this can vary by model.”
If a user asks an AI the same question, there’s a chance the AI might respond with a similar sentence structure or even quote the one from your page (especially tools like Perplexity which are citation-heavy would just cite your site for the Q&A). Google’s SGE has been known to draw from FAQ content for certain queries, and Bing’s chat often lists a source after each factual statement, which frequently come from Q&A pages like forums, StackExchange, or site FAQs. So by embedding Q&A pairs in your content, you’re essentially providing ready-made answer units.
When using Q&A format: Make the question a bolded sentence or a heading, and the answer immediately after. This clear demarcation helps parsing. Keep answers relatively short and to the point (you can always elaborate more below, but the initial answer sentence or two should be crisp). Cover likely questions that stem from your topic. A tip is to use Google’s “People Also Ask” suggestions or tools like AnswerThePublic to find common questions people search. For our electric car example, related questions might be “How much does it cost to replace an electric car battery?” or “Do electric cars lose charge when parked?” – if relevant, add them to FAQ.
If your page is about your product or service, definitely include an FAQ with questions prospective customers or users often ask (this could include comparisons: “Q: How does [Your Product] compare to [Competitor]?”, or specifics: “Q: Does [Your App] work offline?”). You want to be the source of truth for questions about your brand or product. Otherwise, an AI might fill in the blank from elsewhere (which could be outdated or incorrect info).
International and multilingual considerations: Structuring content for AI is not just an English-centric idea. If you cater to non-English markets, the same principles apply. For instance, a French content site optimizing for Bing Chat in French or Baidu’s ERNIE bot in Chinese should also use clear headings (in the target language), bullet points, and FAQs. Naver in Korea has its own AI-driven search features, and having well-structured content in Korean with H2s and lists will help. In fact, one could argue that in languages where fewer sites are doing these optimizations (because much SEO advice is published in English), there’s an even bigger opportunity to stand out by doing so. So if you have multilingual sites, ensure consistency in structured formatting across them ( [27] ) ( [28] ).
For content creators, it underlines the importance of providing clear, distinct explanations in your text. Well-structured definitions or descriptions can be easily excerpted by the AI, as seen here, and including unique insight is crucial for your content to be considered high-quality by both AI and human standards. ( [27] ) ( [28] )
Ensure crawlability and accessibility of structured content
All your structuring efforts are in vain if the AI can’t access your content. Ensure that important sections are in HTML text, not locked in images or inaccessible formats. Navigation and headings should be in the proper HTML tags (H1, H2, li for list items, etc.), not just visually formatted to look like headings. Tools like ChatGPT’s browser plugin or Bing’s index read the raw HTML – if your key info is embedded in a graphic or needs client-side scripts to load, an AI might miss it.
For instance, some sites present FAQs in expandable accordion menus. If those accordions rely on JavaScript to populate content, an AI crawler might not execute the script and thus never see your FAQ answers. A safer approach is to have FAQs rendered in the HTML (perhaps with CSS to hide/show). Additionally, using proper semantic HTML5 elements (like <article>, <section>, <aside> ) where appropriate can give subtle cues about content hierarchy.
Don’t forget the meta (meta descriptions, etc.)
While meta descriptions might not directly influence rankings heavily nowadays, they are a distilled summary of a page. It’s possible that an AI might consider the meta description as a candidate snippet if it’s relevant. In any case, writing a meta description that concisely summarizes the page’s answer to the main question can’t hurt – if nothing else, it helps the traditional snippet and could serve as a fallback summary for AI.
Neil Patel’s guide suggests improving click-through rate with compelling meta descriptions to differentiate from AI summaries ( [29] ), which is slightly tangential but implies that your meta description needs to add value beyond what the AI might show. But also, think of meta descriptions as your own 1-2 sentence summary that AI might pick up indirectly.
Example of AI excerpt-friendly content
To illustrate, let’s imagine two approaches to the same content:
Page A (not optimized): It’s a long article about “How to Train a Puppy”. It has a couple of big blocks of text, a narrative style, and the tips are buried in paragraphs. There are minimal headings (“Introduction”, “Training Tips”, “Conclusion”) and no lists, just prose. A user asks Bing Chat, “Give me tips on potty training a puppy.” The AI might struggle to find the specific tips in Page A quickly, or it might just give an answer synthesized from various sources without quoting Page A, even if Page A had the info somewhere in there.
Page B (optimized): Covers “How to Train a Puppy” but uses many subheadings: “Housebreaking (Potty Training) Your Puppy”, “Crate Training Basics”, “Teaching Basic Commands”, etc. Under each, the first sentence gives the core advice, followed by bullet points for steps. For potty training, it literally has a step-by-step list: Establish a routine (take your puppy out first thing in the morning, etc.) Use positive reinforcement (praise or treat after successful potty) Supervise and contain (don’t give free roam until trained) Clean accidents thoroughly (to remove scent)… etc.
Now, a user asks Bing Chat the same question. It’s highly likely Bing will say something like: “According to PetSite, potty training a puppy involves establishing a routine, using positive reinforcement, supervising your puppy to prevent accidents, and cleaning any accidents to remove odor ( [23] ).” And it will cite PetSite (Page B). This is because Page B served up exactly what the user needed in a structured, AI-readable way.
Page A might have had a brilliant anecdote about puppy psychology, but Page B answered the question clearly and thus became the source for the answer. We see this pattern already with featured snippets, but it will be even more pronounced with generative AI, which aims to give direct answers.
Furthermore, structured content can lead to multiple opportunities within one piece. If your article is comprehensively structured, an AI might cherry-pick different parts for different queries. Using the puppy page example, if someone later asks, “How do I crate train a puppy at night?”, the AI might pull from the “Crate Training Basics” section of Page B. So one well-structured page can answer several user questions – effectively you become a mini knowledge base on that topic.
In summary for structuring: Make your content easy to parse. Think about the units of information within it and delineate them clearly with formatting. When writing, periodically step back and imagine how an AI (or a hurried reader) would view the page: is it obvious where to find the key points? Are answers explicit or do they require reading between lines? By doing this, you not only cater to AI but also end up with extremely reader-friendly content – a double win.
The style of writing that works for GEO (short, clear, sectioned) is also what busy modern readers prefer, especially those skimming on mobile devices. Now that we’ve covered content substance and structure, let’s talk about tone and style – specifically, how adopting a conversational tone and FAQ format can further align your content with the way users interact with generative AI.
Conversational Tone and FAQ Formats
When users interact with generative AI systems like ChatGPT, Google’s Bard/Gemini, or voice assistants, they often use a conversational style – essentially, they “chat” with the AI. Queries are phrased as natural language questions or commands, not just staccato keywords.
For example, a user might type or ask, “What’s the best way to improve my website’s conversion rate without increasing ad spend?” rather than the terse “improve conversion rate without ads.”
This shift from keyword queries to conversational queries is one of the hallmark changes of the LLM revolution in search. To align with this, content that is written in a conversational, reader-friendly tone and anticipates user questions can perform better in generative results. In essence, you want your content to feel like it’s part of a conversation – because it might literally become part of one when an AI weaves it into a chat response.
Conversational tone – why it matters: Large Language Models are trained on human conversation data (among many other sources). ChatGPT, for instance, was fine-tuned to produce responses that sound conversational and helpful. If your content is already in a conversational style, it may more easily fit into the “voice” of an AI-generated answer.
This doesn’t mean everything should be dumbed down or over-casual, but writing in a natural, engaging tone (rather than overly academic or jargon-heavy language) can make your excerpts more seamless when quoted. Imagine an AI assistant answering a question about a complex topic. If it can pull a line from your content that explains a concept clearly and conversationally, it will likely do so to maintain user-friendly language.
For example, suppose someone asks, “Why is my internet so slow sometimes?” If there’s an article that says, “There are a few common reasons your internet might crawl. One likely culprit is congestion – too many devices using the bandwidth at peak times. It’s like rush hour traffic on the web…”, an AI might directly use parts of that answer because it’s easy to understand and relatable (even using a simile like “rush hour traffic”).
In contrast, an article that stated, “Bandwidth contention ratios and network latency often contribute to suboptimal throughput” might be factually useful but is less likely to be quoted verbatim by an AI aiming to give a simple explanation to a general user. In fact, the AI might “translate” such technical jargon into simpler terms on its own, possibly pulling from a different source to do so.
Match the answer style: Some AI platforms have distinct answer styles. Google’s SGE, for instance, tries to maintain a neutral, explanatory tone with concise sentences. Bing Chat can be a bit more chatty or can list steps systematically. If you study a variety of AI answers (which as a content strategist you should!), you’ll notice they often mirror a friendly, instructive tone – very similar to how a knowledgeable peer might talk.
You don’t need to artificially add “friendly chat” elements (like “Hi there! Let’s talk about…” – that might be too much), but a touch of informality can help. Contractions (“can’t” vs “cannot”), directly addressing the reader as “you,” rhetorical questions, and inclusive language (“let’s consider…”) all contribute to a conversational feel.
Q&A (FAQ) format – simulating the dialogue: As touched on in section 9.3, incorporating FAQ sections is powerful because it literally mimics the question-and-answer dynamic of user and AI. But beyond formal FAQ sections, even within your main content you can employ a Q&A style narrative. This can involve posing questions in subheaders or even within paragraphs and then answering them.
For instance, an article might say: “You might be wondering, what’s the catch? The answer is that there isn’t a big one – except you’ll need to invest time.” This internal Q&A method addresses the reader’s potential questions in real-time and answers them. LLMs that see content structured this way might find it very convenient to use, as it’s already in a format of someone asking and someone answering.
Directly addressing user queries: Many SEO experts in the age of voice search (circa 2018-2019) recommended writing in a way that answers should be spoken. That guidance is still relevant but for AI chat. Think about incorporating common user questions as part of your subtopics, and answer them in a personal yet informative tone.
For example, on a travel blog, instead of a bland section header like “Visa Requirements,” you could frame it as “Do I Need a Visa to Visit Japan?” and then answer: “If you’re a U.S. citizen traveling to Japan for tourism under 90 days, you don’t need a visa. However, travelers from Canada, UK, and many other countries also enjoy visa-free entry for short-term visits ( [16] ). Always check the latest requirements, but for most, it’s hassle-free.” Notice this answer speaks to “you,” gives a straightforward “yes/no” then adds advice. An AI that gets the query “Do I need a visa to go to Japan as an American?” could basically quote that answer almost verbatim. The style is conversational and directly responsive.
Incorporate likely follow-up questions: One interesting habit people have with AI chats is asking follow-up questions. For example, after the visa question, the user might ask “What about if I want to work there?” The AI might have to pull from another part of the content or another source. You can pre-empt some of these by naturally including follow-up Q&A in your content.
Many well-optimized articles now include sections like “Related Questions” or simply weave in sentences like, “Another question that often comes up is whether you can extend your stay. The answer is that Japan offers extensions for certain cases, but you’d need to apply at an immigration office well in advance.” By doing this, your content is covering not just one isolated question but the context around it. This can keep the AI engaged with your content for multiple turns of conversation, rather than it hopping to a different site’s info when the user asks the next question.
Tone consistency and context: If your site deals with serious topics (medical, legal, financial advice, etc.), you’ll obviously maintain an appropriate professional tone. Conversational does not mean careless. It means accessible. You can still be conversational and authoritative. In fact, clarity is a component of trustworthiness – if an AI finds a clear explanation on a medical site in plain language, it might favor that over a convoluted one, as long as accuracy is intact.
The key is to avoid sounding like a dry textbook when a more down-to-earth explanation can do. Often this is a matter of breaking long sentences, using active voice, and imagining you’re explaining it to someone in person.
Multimodal and voice aspects: Conversational tone is doubly important for voice-based AI (like Siri, Alexa, or when people use text-to-speech on search results). If an AI is going to speak your content out (which happens on some platforms – e.g., Google Assistant might read out the text from a featured snippet), having that text in a conversational tone improves the experience. It will sound more natural read aloud.
So writing with that possibility in mind is wise. We can see a future (if not present) where someone’s smart speaker answers a question by effectively quoting your website. You’d want that to come across smoothly.
Example – an FAQ-style article snippet used in AI: Consider the website Perplexity AI, which provides citation-rich answers. If a user asks, “How can I boost my website’s speed?” Perplexity might answer with a list of tips and cite a couple of sources for each tip:
If one of the sources is your blog post titled “Q&A: Website Speed Optimization,” which has a section like…
- Q: What’s the easiest way to improve site speed? A: Optimize your images. Large image files are often the #1 cause of slow pages. By compressing images (using tools or modern formats like WebP) you can dramatically cut load times ( [23] ).
- Q: Does web hosting affect speed? A: Absolutely. Cheaper shared hosting might struggle to serve your pages quickly during traffic spikes. Using a quality host or a Content Delivery Network (CDN) can ensure consistent performance.
…Perplexity’s answer might incorporate both of those points, and it will likely reference your site as the source.
The reason: you literally posed the same questions the user did, and you answered them succinctly and authoritatively. This is not hypothetical; Perplexity’s design is to find direct question-answer pairs or relevant sentences to compile the answer, and it loves FAQs.
Creating a dialogue in narrative form: Another approach to conversational style (though use sparingly and appropriately) is to write some content in a quasi-dialogue or first-person narrative.
For instance, a personal finance site might have an article “We Asked a Financial Advisor: Here’s How to Save for Retirement in Your 30s” – and structure it like an interview or a first-person response to common questions. This can both engage readers and present content in a QA or conversational format.
An AI might quote the advisor’s direct words. Example: “Q: Should I pay off debt or invest while I’m in my 30s? A: It depends on the interest rates. I often tell my clients: if your debt interest is higher than what you’d likely earn investing, tackle the debt first ( [15] ). If not, you can do both – pay the minimums and start investing a bit. Time in the market is your ally at this age.” This reads like a conversation, and indeed an AI might adopt that answer for a similar user query. Notice, it’s friendly (“I often tell my clients…” makes it personal and credible) but informative.
Global considerations: In non-English contexts, similar adaptation to a conversational style is beneficial. For instance, Japanese corporate content is traditionally quite formal, but if targeting a younger or broader audience through AI assistants, a slightly more colloquial tone (still polite) may make the content more shareable by AI. Cultural expectations matter; one should always balance conversational tone with respect for local business communication norms. But as AI use grows, we see even formal organizations simplifying language to communicate effectively (e.g., many government sites now have plain-language Q&A for citizens). Aligning with how people naturally ask questions in their native language – and how an AI might respond – is key.
Maintain professionalism: “Conversational” doesn’t mean inserting slang (unless your brand voice is intentionally that casual) or telling unrelated jokes. It means writing as if you’re talking to the reader one-on-one, in a helpful manner. For B2B or highly technical industries, this might manifest as a friendly explanatory tone rather than a dry spec sheet tone. You’re aiming for clarity and approachability, not silliness (unless appropriate).
Brand voice considerations: Ensure the tone still aligns with your brand voice guidelines. If your brand is very formal, you might moderate the conversational style to still sound like “you.” But note, many brands are shifting to a more conversational voice in general because it fosters connection and trust. The trick is to do it without losing authority.
For example, a line like, “We get it – nobody enjoys slogging through 50-page manuals. That’s why we’ve distilled the key points you need to know about tax law changes below.” This is conversational, relatable, yet it still promises useful info (and indeed the content following should be spot-on and accurate). An AI might skip the “we get it” part but use the distilled key points directly.
Community and conversational content: If your site has elements like community forums, user Q&A, or even social media embeds, these can inject conversational elements too. As mentioned, Google’s AI overview has drawn from forums like Reddit because that content is literally conversation. If you host your own community discussions, summarizing insights from them in a conversational way can enrich your content and potentially give AI a reason to pick it up (especially if there are unique real-user tips).
Voice Search 2.0 preview: it’s worth noting here that as voice interaction rebounds powered by better AI, content that sounds good when spoken is invaluable. Reading your content draft aloud (or using text-to-speech tools) can be an enlightening exercise. If a sentence is awkward to say or understand in one go, consider revising it. The smoother it flows in speech, the more likely an AI voice assistant can use it directly.
To sum up this section: Write with the user, not at the user. Pretend you are an AI assistant yourself when drafting answers on your site – how would you explain this to someone in a friendly, concise way? If you can nail that tone and format, you essentially future-proof your content to be AI-friendly. It will feel natural if read by a bot, and it will satisfy the human on the other end with clear information. By embedding a conversational, Q&A ethos in your content, you make it inherently more compatible with the generative engines that are increasingly mediating information access.
Finally, even great content written and structured perfectly can become outdated or stale. In a fast-moving world, ongoing updates and refinements are necessary to maintain content relevance – especially because AI models have knowledge cutoffs and might not be aware of the latest facts. Our last section addresses the importance of keeping content current and monitoring how AI reflects your content over time.
Updating and Refining Content for Ongoing Relevance
The digital landscape is never static – industries evolve, new information emerges, and user needs shift. In the context of GEO, keeping your content up-to-date is crucial not only for traditional SEO (where freshness can influence rankings) but also for how generative AI systems perceive and use your content.
Generative models have “knowledge cut-off” dates – for example, as of mid-2025, ChatGPT’s default model might know a lot up to 2021-2022, with some incremental updates, but it may not know facts from late 2024 unless specifically told via plugins or new training. Google’s SGE and Bing Chat operate on current indices to an extent, but even they might occasionally serve outdated info if the source content wasn’t updated. Moreover, if an AI is summarizing your page and your page has old data, it will happily spread that old data to users. Thus, regularly auditing and refreshing your content is a must-do practice in GEO.
Combatting AI’s knowledge cut-off
Large Language Models like GPT-4 have a fixed set of training data up to a certain point in time. If your content is about a topic that changes (think: medical guidelines, technology versions, laws, etc.), anything new after the model’s cut-off won’t be accounted for in its answers, unless the model can access up-to-date info through tools.
For example, if ChatGPT (with a 2021 cut-off) is asked about the “latest iPhone battery life”, it might not know about iPhone models after that date. It could respond with outdated info (potentially citing an iPhone 12 when we’re on iPhone 15). As a content creator, you can’t directly change a model’s training, but you can ensure that when AI systems that do have web access (like Bing Chat, Google’s AI, or ChatGPT via browsing) come looking, they find the latest and correct info on your site.
That means updating statistics, dates, references, examples, and product information on a regular basis. A best practice is to add “last updated” timestamps on content (and in the metadata) when you make significant updates – this not only signals to search engines that the content is fresh, but also helps human readers trust that it’s current.
For instance, if you have an article “Top Social Media Trends in 2024” that did well, consider updating it to “…in 2025” when the time comes, or write a fresh one and cross-link, but also keep the older one updated with a note. If an AI is asked in early 2025 “What are the big social media trends this year?”, it might actually incorporate points from late-2024 articles that have “2025” in them (as forward-looking). If your 2024 article hasn’t been touched since January 2024, the AI might consider it stale or overlook it in favor of one updated in Dec 2024.
Monitoring AI outputs for your content
A novel aspect of GEO is that you need to monitor not just search engine rankings and traffic, but also how (and if) AI assistants are presenting your content or brand. In other words, you should find out what AI is saying about you or your topic. This was already touched on in another post, but here it’s about using those insights to refine content. There are tools emerging that can help with this.
For example, Visualping (a website change monitoring tool) published a guide on how to monitor brand mentions in ChatGPT outputs ( [30] ) ( [31] ). The idea is you could set up queries in ChatGPT (via the web UI or an API) that you care about – say, your brand name or your product category – and periodically check what the answer is and whether your brand or content is included or not.
There are also specialized services like BrandMonitor AI or Surfer’s “AI tracker” that claim to show how often AI tools mention your brand or content ( [32] ). Using these, or even manual spot-checks, you can identify if the AI has outdated or incorrect info. For example, a company might discover that ChatGPT says “BrandX was acquired by CompanyY in 2018” which isn’t true (maybe a rumor or a confusion with another brand). That misinformation could be floating in the model.
How to correct it? You can’t directly re-train the model, but you can address it publicly in content. In this hypothetical, BrandX might publish a clarifying post, or ensure Wikipedia/Crunchbase has correct data, etc. Over time, future models or current search-enabled models will pick up the correction. Google’s SGE, which scans live content, might immediately correct course if it was getting the wrong idea from an old article.
Another scenario: Your site is a recipe site, and you see that when someone asks an AI for a certain recipe, the AI provides it but doesn’t mention your site whereas it mentions two others. Perhaps your recipe phrasing wasn’t easily parseable, or you lacked a summary, or maybe you used unusual ingredient terms that the AI didn’t map correctly. Learning from what the AI chose to use (the competitor recipes in this case) can guide you to tweak your content. Maybe add a simpler summary of the recipe steps, use standard ingredient names alongside local ones, etc.
Essentially, treat AI answers as an extension of search results to optimize for. Rand Fishkin, a prominent marketer, has been vocal about the idea of “feeding” training data to influence LLM outputs ( [12] ) ( [33] ). His approach, in summary, is to identify what sources an AI is drawing from and make sure your brand is mentioned in those contexts (for example, ensuring your brand appears in key articles, lists, and discussions related to your niche).
For your content strategy, that can mean creating content that is likely to be included in future training sets: writing guest posts on high-authority sites, getting into Wikipedia or well-known databases, etc. But within your own site content, it means aligning with widely used terminology and addressing popular questions so that your content becomes part of the “consensus” that AI learns. If you coin a completely new term for something, AI might not know it or use it (unless it catches on broadly). So balance originality with common framing. For instance, if you have an innovative concept, still explain it in terms of known concepts so AI connects the dots.
The role of continuous content improvement
Just as SEO is not a one-and-done task, optimizing for generative AI is ongoing. You should plan to revisit high-value content periodically. Check if there have been significant developments on the topic since your last update. Even if the core content remains valid, you might add a new paragraph addressing a recent trend or a new common question that arose. Not only does this keep the content relevant, but it also expands the net of queries for which your content could be useful to an AI.
Remember, AI might pull any part of your content that’s relevant to a user’s question – so the more comprehensively you cover a topic (within reason), the more chances you have to be featured. However, a note of caution: accuracy and consistency. When updating, ensure you update all instances of data or claims that need it.
It’s easy to change a stat in one spot and miss another. An AI might find the outdated mention elsewhere on your page and cite that, undermining your goal. For example, if in 2023 you wrote “XYZ market size is $10B (2022)” and in 2025 it’s $15B, update that, but also update any downstream analysis that might have said “with a $10B market, we expect…” so it doesn’t conflict. AI’s don’t “know” which number is correct if you have two; they might average or choose one arbitrarily, which could be the old one.
Many content teams now maintain content calendars for refreshes. This could be a schedule like: light update after 3 months (quick fact check), moderate update after 6-9 months (new section if needed, update references), heavy revision or rewrite after 12-18 months if topic is very dynamic.
Of course, if something big changes next week, update right away – don’t wait for a scheduled cycle.
Signaling recency to AI
When AI does have a browsing capability or the search engine feeding it does, signaling that your content is up-to-date can help. Some ways to signal: Use phrases in content like “As of 2025” or “In a 2024 survey, …” – this explicitly time-stamps a statement. If an AI sees “as of 2025, the population is …” it knows that is current as of 2025. If it sees “the population is …” with no year, it might not be sure how current that is.
Use Schema markup for dates (e.g., article:published_time and modified_time) so machines see last modified date. Republishing articles (if appropriate) with a current date can make them appear fresh in indices that the AI is using. For data-driven content, consider updating the title or H1 to include the year when updated (“…in 2025”) which is a strong signal of freshness. Just ensure to update the content accordingly.
If using a platform like ChatGPT with browsing, an updated date might not matter if the user doesn’t specify wanting the latest – the AI might give a generic answer anyway. But on something like Perplexity, if your content is one of few with a 2025 date and others are older, it might choose yours.
Monitoring and responding to AI-driven traffic changes
When you update content, watch if there’s any change in traffic patterns, especially from search. Some generative experiences (like SGE) might reduce clicks to your site if they give the answer directly, but if you update content to be the chosen reference, you might at least get cited (Google SGE shows source links, Bing always cites). If after updates you see improved ranking and perhaps your site is mentioned in AI overviews (you can test queries yourself in these AI search labs), that’s a good sign.
Conversely, if an AI snapshot is giving an answer and not citing you even though you have the info, analyze the differences. Maybe your content wasn’t clearly phrased, or the AI combined multiple sources. It’s possible you need to be in the top search results first to get cited in an AI overview – Neil Patel’s blog noted “AI Overviews pull from existing high-ranking pages. If you’re not already ranking, AI won’t suddenly send you traffic.” ( [34] ). So traditional SEO and GEO go hand in hand: update content to rank well and also to satisfy AI selection criteria.
Correcting AI when it’s wrong about you
If you find an AI persistently gives wrong info related to your domain (like mis-defining a term your company invented, or misattributing a quote), you can attempt to provide feedback to the AI or source. Google’s SGE has a feedback option for its responses – use it if you see an error. OpenAI allows users to flag incorrect info as well via the interface (“thumbs down” and explain). While a single feedback might not change much, if something is widely reported as incorrect, it can lead to adjustments or at least be noted for future model training.
Additionally, publish a clarifying content piece. For example, some SEO folks found that ChatGPT would sometimes say one tool was discontinued even when it wasn’t. The tool’s company then put out content that clearly stated “No, ToolX is not discontinued – here’s the scoop.” They also ensured other sites (like community Q&A or press releases) carried that message. Over time, as GPT-4 got updated or users used browsing, that myth subsided. It’s like doing PR to correct a false rumor, except the “audience” is an AI model’s knowledge.
Also, engage with the community : if misinformation about your brand or field is in the AI output, likely it stemmed from some content out there. You might need to address the root – maybe a third-party article had a mistake. Contact them to fix it if possible, because that source might be what the AI read.
Ongoing learning and content refinement
Finally, consider using AI itself to audit your content for clarity and completeness. Prompt ChatGPT or Claude with something like: “You are an expert on X. Here is an article [paste it]. What questions might readers still have after reading this? Is any part unclear or potentially outdated?” The AI might point out sections that could be improved or updated. Of course, double-check its suggestions with human judgment, but it’s a neat way to get a quick audit from the perspective of a highly informed reader.
Keep an eye on competitors too. If they have updated their content with new sections or multimedia and you haven’t, they might become the preferred source for AI answers. For example, maybe they added a “Frequently Mistaken Facts” section that addresses common myths (something an AI might use to preemptively clarify user questions). Don’t copy them, but use it as inspiration for how you can one-up with even better content.
Industry case in point: Let’s say you run a health information site. In 2024, guidelines for a certain supplement dosage changed according to new research. If you update your relevant articles promptly with the new recommendation (and date it), when people ask an AI in 2025 about that supplement dosage, your site stands a good chance of being reflected because it has the latest info. If you didn’t update, the AI might cite older guidance (and maybe from a competitor or a news article that did cover the update).
Another example: an e-commerce site that keeps its product descriptions current with stock status, new features, or price drops might benefit on Bing’s shopping-oriented chat which might say “According to the website, it’s currently on sale for $299 and available in 3 colors ( [35] ) ( [36] ).” If that site forgot to update and still listed it as $349, that misinformation either confuses the AI or, worse, gets passed to the user (leading to a poor user experience and potentially lost trust).
To wrap up, treat content as a living asset in the GEO era. Regular maintenance, timely improvements, and responsiveness to how AI portrays your content are all part of the game. Not only does this approach help with AI, but it naturally boosts your overall content quality and SEO. Sites that continuously refine their content often build a reputation for accuracy and comprehensiveness, which in turn earns more backlinks, user loyalty, and yes, favorable treatment by algorithms (AI or not).
Key Takeaways: In this article, we explored how content strategy must evolve for the generative AI age. By focusing on E-E-A-T and originality, you ensure your content stands out with the authority and unique value that AI systems look for in sources ( [3] ) ( [13] ). We discussed crafting content AI can’t easily replicate, such as original research and personal insights, making your work a “hidden gem” that AI would want to quote ( [37] ). We emphasized structuring your content with clear sections, bullet points, and FAQs, effectively handing AI models the exact snippets to use ( [20] ) ( [38] ).
Adopting a conversational tone and Q&A format further aligns your content with how users interact with chatbots, increasing the likelihood that your text appears naturally in an AI’s response. And importantly, continuously updating and monitoring your content ensures that what AI learns and shares about your brand remains current and accurate. By implementing the strategies from this article, content marketers and SEO professionals can significantly improve their chances of maintaining visibility in organic search and being present in the answers provided by the next generation of AI search tools.
Generative AI doesn’t mean the end of organic content visibility – rather, it rewards a new level of quality, clarity, and user-centric design. In the following articles, we’ll build on this foundation, looking at the technical aspects, off-page and brand signals, and more, to round out a comprehensive approach to Generative Engine Optimization.
References
[1] Changetower.Com Article – Changetower.Com URL: https://changetower.com/uses-seo-monitoring/seo-vs-geo
[2] Developers.Google.Com Article – Developers.Google.Com URL: https://developers.google.com/search/blog/2023/02/google-search-and-ai-content
[3] Changetower.Com Article – Changetower.Com URL: https://changetower.com/uses-seo-monitoring/seo-vs-geo
[4] Aokmarketing.Com Article – Aokmarketing.Com URL: https://aokmarketing.com/e-e-a-t-guide-for-marketers-enhancing-experience-expertise-authority-trust/chatgpt-image-may-30-2025-04_41_23-pm
[5] Developers.Google.Com Article – Developers.Google.Com URL: https://developers.google.com/search/blog/2023/02/google-search-and-ai-content
[6] Localmedia.Org Article – Localmedia.Org URL: https://localmedia.org/2024/02/mastering-e-e-a-t-a-strategic-guide-for-publishers-in-the-age-of-ai-search
[7] www.proceedinnovative.com – Proceedinnovative.Com URL: https://www.proceedinnovative.com/blog/eeat-google-ai-search-optimization
[8] www.proceedinnovative.com – Proceedinnovative.Com URL: https://www.proceedinnovative.com/blog/eeat-google-ai-search-optimization
[9] Changetower.Com Article – Changetower.Com URL: https://changetower.com/uses-seo-monitoring/seo-vs-geo
[10] Neilpatel.Com Article – Neilpatel.Com URL: https://neilpatel.com/blog/seo-generative-ai
[11] Neilpatel.Com Article – Neilpatel.Com URL: https://neilpatel.com/blog/seo-generative-ai
[12] Sparktoro.Com Article – Sparktoro.Com URL: https://sparktoro.com/blog/how-can-my-brand-appear-in-answers-from-chatgpt-perplexity-gemini-and-other-ai-llm-tools
[13] Neilpatel.Com Article – Neilpatel.Com URL: https://neilpatel.com/blog/seo-generative-ai
[14] Neilpatel.Com Article – Neilpatel.Com URL: https://neilpatel.com/blog/seo-generative-ai
[15] Visualping.Io Article – Visualping.Io URL: https://visualping.io/blog/monitor-brand-chatgpt
[16] www.conductor.com – Conductor.Com URL: https://www.conductor.com/academy/search-generative-experience
[17] www.conductor.com – Conductor.Com URL: https://www.conductor.com/academy/search-generative-experience
[18] Neilpatel.Com Article – Neilpatel.Com URL: https://neilpatel.com/blog/seo-generative-ai
[19] www.proceedinnovative.com – Proceedinnovative.Com URL: https://www.proceedinnovative.com/blog/eeat-google-ai-search-optimization
[20] Neilpatel.Com Article – Neilpatel.Com URL: https://neilpatel.com/blog/seo-generative-ai
[21] Changetower.Com Article – Changetower.Com URL: https://changetower.com/uses-seo-monitoring/seo-vs-geo
[22] Neilpatel.Com Article – Neilpatel.Com URL: https://neilpatel.com/blog/seo-generative-ai
[23] Neilpatel.Com Article – Neilpatel.Com URL: https://neilpatel.com/blog/seo-generative-ai
[24] Neilpatel.Com Article – Neilpatel.Com URL: https://neilpatel.com/blog/seo-generative-ai
[25] www.proceedinnovative.com – Proceedinnovative.Com URL: https://www.proceedinnovative.com/blog/eeat-google-ai-search-optimization
[26] www.proceedinnovative.com – Proceedinnovative.Com URL: https://www.proceedinnovative.com/blog/eeat-google-ai-search-optimization
[27] www.proceedinnovative.com – Proceedinnovative.Com URL: https://www.proceedinnovative.com/blog/eeat-google-ai-search-optimization
[28] www.proceedinnovative.com – Proceedinnovative.Com URL: https://www.proceedinnovative.com/blog/eeat-google-ai-search-optimization
[29] Neilpatel.Com Article – Neilpatel.Com URL: https://neilpatel.com/blog/seo-generative-ai
[30] Visualping.Io Article – Visualping.Io URL: https://visualping.io/blog/monitor-brand-chatgpt
[31] Visualping.Io Article – Visualping.Io URL: https://visualping.io/blog/monitor-brand-chatgpt
[32] Surferseo.Com Article – Surferseo.Com URL: https://surferseo.com/updates/ai-tracker
[33] Sparktoro.Com Article – Sparktoro.Com URL: https://sparktoro.com/blog/how-can-my-brand-appear-in-answers-from-chatgpt-perplexity-gemini-and-other-ai-llm-tools
[34] Neilpatel.Com Article – Neilpatel.Com URL: https://neilpatel.com/blog/seo-generative-ai
[35] www.conductor.com – Conductor.Com URL: https://www.conductor.com/academy/search-generative-experience
[36] www.conductor.com – Conductor.Com URL: https://www.conductor.com/academy/search-generative-experience
[37] Neilpatel.Com Article – Neilpatel.Com URL: https://neilpatel.com/blog/seo-generative-ai
[38] Neilpatel.Com Article – Neilpatel.Com URL: https://neilpatel.com/blog/seo-generative-ai